Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The resignation of Trinamool Congress (TMC) member Sushmita Dev from the Rajya Sabha in June 2026 puts into stark relief the parliamentary constitutional procedures relating…
In a high-profile operation, the CBI arrested IRS officer Amit Kumar Singal for demanding and receiving Rs 45 lakh in bribes. Charged under Sections 7, 8, and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the case highlights strengthened anti-graft enforcement.
In Sharmistha Panoli’s case, police charged her under Sections 196, 297, and 300 of the BNS after she criticized religious practices online. The arrest sparks debate over free speech, intent requirements, overcriminalization, and judicial safeguards under India’s new criminal law.
According to a decision handed down by the Supreme Court, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission is required to conduct its own independent evaluation of insurance reimbursement rather than relying just on the report of a complainant’s surveyor. The case was sent back to the court for a new determination to be made regarding the exact amount of compensation.
The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N. Bhatti, clarified that deemed tenancy under the Bombay Rent Act cannot be claimed from business conducting agreements. The ruling emphasizes distinct contractual intent, protecting property owners and ensuring clarity in commercial lease disputes.
The Supreme Court, led by Justices B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih, clarified that the 2012 amendment to the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act does not apply retroactively in a parole violation case, ensuring fair application of law and protecting prisoner rights.
The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, and Augustine George Masih, upheld the cut-off date for valid category certificates in the Rajasthan Judicial Service Exam, ensuring procedural fairness. The ruling reinforces strict adherence to eligibility criteria, promoting transparency in judicial recruitment.
The Supreme Court, with Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, clarified that liability in accidents involving hazardous goods vehicles without proper endorsement falls on the vehicle owner and driver. The ruling emphasizes strict compliance with transport regulations to ensure safety and accountability under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The Supreme Court, led by Justices Sanjay Karol and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, restored criminal proceedings against the former CFO of Daechang Seat Automotive Pvt. Ltd. for alleged ₹10 crore GST fraud. The ruling emphasizes protecting foreign investments while ensuring fair trials, overturning the Karnataka High Court’s quashing of the case.
The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, clarified that government assistance must be deducted from motor accident compensation to prevent double recovery. The ruling ensures fair compensation while maintaining equity in claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The Supreme Court issued a significant decision in which it acquitted the accused in a murder case that was tied to the alleged smuggling of sand. The court cited poor circumstantial evidence, procedural delays, and untrustworthy witness testimonies as the reasons for its decision. This decision reinforced the norm of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
