Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The resignation of Trinamool Congress (TMC) member Sushmita Dev from the Rajya Sabha in June 2026 puts into stark relief the parliamentary constitutional procedures relating…
The Supreme Court, led by Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, upheld exclusive jurisdiction clauses in private employment contracts, affirming their enforceability. The ruling clarifies that such clauses bind parties to designated courts, ensuring legal certainty and streamlining dispute resolution in employment agreements.
According to a decision made by the Supreme Court, civil disputes cannot be resolved by using criminal law. The First Information Report (FIR) No. 21 of 2019 against G.V. Adhimoolam and others was suppressed on the grounds that the complaint was filed out of revenge and did not have any criminal purpose.
Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran upheld the legality of a tribal land sale under Section 165 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, affirming compliance with regulatory provisions. The landmark ruling strengthens tribal land rights while ensuring legal transfers, promoting clarity in property transactions.
The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Rajesh Bindal and N. Kotiswar Singh, upheld the validity of a 1967 gift deed, rejecting the retrospective application of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act. The ruling clarifies that pre-1988 transactions are exempt, prioritizing legal clarity and property rights.
The decision that the Supreme Court made in the case of Soumen Paul and Others versus Shrabani Nayek and Others is the subject of this article. The article focuses on the qualifying requirements for the employment of primary teachers in the state of West Bengal. Critical legal uncertainties in the procedures governing teacher recruitment are resolved by the verdict.
In order to safeguard retired workers from having to recover overpayment salaries that were issued as a result of administrative errors, the Supreme Court emphasized that no recovery may be made without a hearing and that there must be no instances of fraud or misrepresentation on the part of the employee.
In a decision that found in favor of retired stenographers, the Supreme Court halted the recovery of extra income that had been given out as a result of a clerical error. This decision brought to light the principles of equity, non-fraudulent overpayment, and equal opportunity of hearing in matters pertaining to public employment.
According to the Supreme Court’s clarification, the statute of limitations in arbitration law is computed as three calendar months from the date of award reception, except the day that the award was received. In the event that the final day falls on a court holiday, the form can be submitted on the following working day.
As a result of a decision made by the Supreme Court, retirement age extension benefits for disabled government employees cannot be restricted to only one form of disability. Until the policy was withdrawn, it allowed for a portion of the benefits to be provided to an employee who had a locomotor handicap.
Under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Supreme Court has decided that when there is no minimum punishment stipulated for an offense, the only punishment that applies is sixty days of detention without charges. An Official Secrets Act case was brought before the court, and the court upheld Rajeev Sharma’s default bail.
