BNSS

Summons Beyond Borders: Sections 69, 70, 71 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Explained

This article provides an explanation of Sections 69, 70, and 71 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. These sections address the matters of serving a summons outside of the local jurisdiction of a court, providing documentation of such service, and serving summonses to witnesses through the use of technological methods and the postal service.

BNSS

Understanding Sections 66, 67, and 68 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Sections 66, 67, and 68 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are discussed in this article. The article focuses on the legal procedures that must be followed in order to serve a summons in situations when the person who is being summoned is either unable to be located or is a government employee. It is supplied for clarification that simple illustrations are provided.

BNSS

Sections 63, 64 and 65 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Procedure and Form of Summons Explained

Section 63, Section 64, and Section 65 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are broken down and explained in this article. These sections provide an explanation of the process of issuing and serving summonses, including the procedures that are followed for people, corporations, firms, and societies. Particular attention is paid to both physical and electronic modes of service.

BNSS

Understanding Sections 60, 61, and 62 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is broken down into its sections 60, 62, and 63, which are explained in this article. The discharge of arrested individuals, the authority to seek escaped detainees, and the regulations for initiating arrests are all governed by these parts. Additionally, these sections ensure that compliance with the law is maintained and protect individual rights.

Supreme Court

Supreme Court, in Judgment by Justice Surya Kant, Emphasizes Procedural Fairness in Industrial Land Allotment to KNMT

Supreme Court in Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust v. UPSIDC affirmed UPSIDC’s cancellation of KNMT’s industrial land allotment, emphasizing strict contractual compliance, procedural fairness, valid legal notices, transparency, and accountability. The Court underscored the Public Trust Doctrine and restrained appellate interference