Keeping Pace with Legal Change
It happens more often than people want to admit. Two adults meet. They date for years. Things get serious and marriage is discussed. Then it…
The Supreme Court rejected civil appeals that were filed against setting up of a petrol pump, on the basis of the suppression of similar High Court proceedings and without bona fide. It is note that the Court stressed integrity during legal proceedings by awarding exemplary costs.
In this judgment Justice Sharma held that untested Sub‑Registrar testimony cannot trump clear proof of forged documents used to divert compensation Supreme Court affirmed that conspiracy and cheating under IPC Sections 120B 415 and 420 remain unaffected by pending suits
In Kaduru Chinnappanna v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court ruled that only the Supreme Court‑constituted SIT may investigate, holding any extra‑SIT nominations void and reinforcing strict compliance with apex court orders to ensure a fair, independent inquiry.
Oh man, in P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandass, the court basically called out the advocate for breaking his promise to vacate the place—yeah, that’s civil contempt, no question. The judges weren’t messing around; they made it super clear: play games with court orders, stall for time, try to be clever? Nope. That kind of stuff’s gonna get you punished. Gotta respect the court’s word, or face the music.
By Justice Katju and Miss. Bedasruti Das
Difference between s 9 and s11 evidence act is difficult to gauge. And hence i asked gpt about it. S9…
Rajeev Kumar Sharma, a seasoned 1990-batch IPS officer, has been appointed as Rajasthan’s new DGP. Known for integrity and legal expertise, he is expected to strengthen law enforcement, improve police efficiency, and ensure public safety through fair and effective leadership.
Ajmer court has taken cognizance of a criminal complaint against Drishti IAS founder Vikas Divyakirti for allegedly making sarcastic and defamatory comments about the judiciary in a viral video. He has been summoned to appear personally on July 22 for apparent offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and IT Act.
The Delhi High Court put on hold the release of ‘Udaipur Files’ on July 10, 2025, on charges of procedural non-compliance. Petitioners Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind and journalist Prashant Tandon objected to the CBFC certification of the film for promoting communal disharmony. The Court instructed them to approach the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The release of the film is stuck until the government makes a decision within a week after hearing both parties. The decision highlights statutory remedy and a judicious balance between free speech and public order.
In a 2025 judgement, the Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a petition under Article 32 seeking exclusive Buddhist control over the Mahabodhi Temple, Bodh Gaya. Filed by ex-minister Sulekhatai Kumbhare, the petition challenged the constitutional validity of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949. The Court cited procedural grounds, suggesting the matter be taken to the Patna High Court. The case underscores ongoing tensions around religious autonomy and minority rights in sacred site administration.
