Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Supreme Court on Monday 21st July 2025, revoked anticipatory bail to Vishwajeet Jadhav and his relatives against accusations of hijacking estranged wife’s Hotel Vaishali in Pune. The court believed the accused had hidden facts and misused judicial proceedings in a serious criminal trespass case.
The renouncement of the misuse of criminal law in a case of the real nature of the civil dispute is…
This article discusses one of the major judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India in 2025 based on a…
In a landmark judgment passed by the Supreme Court of India on 16th July, 2025 in the case of KRISHNA…
In the recent years of the (already old) history of Supreme Court of India the case PNB Housing Finance Limited…
The apex court explained the principles of law as laid down under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC that a bona fide purchaser is a proper party in an action of specific performance admittedly in impleadment. This verdict supports the discretionary power of the judiciary in the weighting of procedural fairness.
It was ruled in the Angadi Chandranna case by the Supreme Court. Shankar & Ors., elucidated essential issues of Hindu law regarding property. It held that self-acquisition of a property which was obtained through personal funds after the partition did not fall liable to claims by the coparceners, and strengthened boundaries of Section 100 CPC.
This abstract discusses interpleader suits under Section 88 and Order XXXV of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, with an emphasis on their applicability and related suit charges in Rajasthan under the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 (Sections 44 and 45). An interpleader suit settles conflicts between defendants asserting the same property or debt from an impartial plaintiff, who wishes to escape liability. Section 44 regulates computation of fees on plaints, and Section 45 prescribes rates for suits not otherwise specified. The research identifies procedural subtleties and cost considerations in Rajasthan’s legal system.
