Justice Ketanji Jackson’s dissent
By Justice Katju, former Judge of Indian Supreme Court
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
By Justice Katju, former Judge of Indian Supreme Court
In this article, we are going to examine the Abdul Hameed v. State case, a landmark judgment explaining anticipatory bail under the new BNSS in India. It focuses on the maintenance of consecutive bail applications, the retrospective effect of procedural legislations such as BNSS and principle of beneficial law in the sense that the evolution of the law legally deserves reconsideration of bail considering the new legal considerations.
This paper discusses a PIL filed in the Bombay High Court alleging that Prada had infringed the Kolhapuri chappals. It discusses the sustainability of PIL on the issue of IPR, especially on traditional knowledge and GI tags. The debate raises issues and advantages about the applicability of PIL as an instrument to have global business undermine the rights of culture and craftsmanship.
The case of The Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Suraj Kumar & Ors., considers the extent of the liability of an insurer under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, particularly concerning long-term rehabilitation assistance (prosthetics and assistive devices) to a motor accident victim.