Keeping Pace with Legal Change
In this paper, the author has examined the DAZN Limited & Anr. vs. Buffsports.me & Ors., a case reported in the Delhi High Court which provides a dynamic injunction against illicit streaming of sports. It describes the role of the court regarding the copyright and the right to broadcast during the digital era and the necessity to stop online piracy.
In a high profile motor accident case, compensation was awarded to the claimants of the case by the Supreme Court after the high court had dismissed the income tax evidence in a most arbitrary manner and the court reiterated that compensation should be in line with the actual income primarily as a welfare intention of the Motor Vehicles Act.
By issuing an order to destroy the Madrasi Camp encroachment on the Barapullah drain, the Delhi High Court has articulated its responsibility to maintain environmental safeguards and urban infrastructure. The ruling, which is based on the public trust concept, municipal law, and environmental legislation, strengthens the legal procedures that are in place to clean environmental streams.
On June 5, 2025, the Delhi High Court made a big decision that strongly criticized Delhi Public School (DPS) Dwarka.…
The Delhi High Court on June 6, 2025, upheld objections to two CLAT PG 2025 questions, deeming them ambiguous and unfair. The court directed the Consortium of NLUs to revise the answer key and reissue corrected results at the earliest.
Justice G.C. Mittal’s four-decade judicial career transformed Indian jurisprudence. As Delhi High Court Chief Justice, he clarified family law duties, strengthened insurance, juvenile justice protections, refined evidence standards, and advanced women’s rights, leaving a legacy of fair and principled adjudication.
An FIR that had been filed against a man who was accused of gazing at a woman while they were both on a flight was dismissed by the Delhi High Court after the two parties reached a mutually agreeable settlement. The judge decided that prolonging the proceedings would not achieve any beneficial outcome and could be seen as an abuse of process.
This article provides an explanation of the process by which the Supreme Court determined whether or not sexual consent derived from a promise of marriage is valid. This paper investigates Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and the legal framework that governs partnerships that involve adult consent and subsequent charges of rape.
BJP leader Shazia Ilmi sued journalist Rajdeep Sardesai for defamation after a video from a heated India Today debate on the Agniveer scheme allegedly violated her privacy. The Delhi High Court ordered the video’s removal, citing privacy rights, while partially upholding defamation claims.
Spiritual leader Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev has approached the Delhi High Court to protect his personality rights, a form of intellectual property, against unauthorized AI-generated content. The petition addresses the misuse of his name, image, and voice through deepfake technology and rogue websites, which exploit his reputation for commercial gain, including fraudulent product endorsements and misleading narratives. The court issued an interim order to remove such content, emphasizing the balance between free speech and reputational rights. This case highlights the growing legal challenges surrounding AI-driven identity misuse and the protection of personality rights in the digital era.
