Keeping Pace with Legal Change
This paper studies the case of SD in India delivered by the Supreme Court of India. Shabuddin v. The State…
In the present case, the SC affirmed the order of the Trial Court, which was quashed by the High Court…
The SC upheld the ruling of the High Court in convicting the accused of rape and house-trespass despite medical evidence being unsupportive, because the victim’s testimony invoked enough confidence in the court to not let lack of medical evidence overpower the testimony.
It was a crucial criminal appeal case (Criminal Appeal No. 2695 of 2025) considered by the Supreme Court of India…
The case in question is of traumatizing nature as the Supreme Court of India recently declared a case that was…
On July 16, 2025, the Supreme Court of India upheld the death sentence of Byluru Thippaiah (Byaluru Thippaiah or Nayakara…
The case was observed by the Supreme Court of India in the Criminal Appeal Nos. 331-332 of 2022, which concerned…
In this historic decision, the Supreme Court made it clear that those who are on deputation are still under the protection of section 197 of CrPC and cannot be charged without such a sanction and the important constitutional protection is intact.
In Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh v., the Supreme Court held that, The case State of Uttar Pradesh was a case on the basis of which it was held that failure of putting the vital prosecution evidence to the accused u/s 313 CrPC resulted in prejudice and trial invalidated, and as a result, the acquittal was upheld on the basis of serious allegations like multiple murders.
InN. Vijay Kumar v. The Supreme Court in Vishwanath Rao N. reinstated the acquittal of the alleged perpetrator in a cheque dishonour trial and set the benchmarks and boundaries of the rebuttable presumptions against the Negotiable Instruments Act and questioned the burden of proof of the parties concerning evidence.
