Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The phoney 'journalist' Neelu Vyas, who thinks good journalism lies in creating sensations, even if they are based on fake news ( as that increases…
Following a peaceful resolution between the two parties, the First Information Report (FIR) that had been filed against a man who was accused of gazing at a lady on a flight was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. The court came to the conclusion that pursuing the lawsuit would be pointless and emphasized the significance of resolving disagreements of this kind by mutual agreement wherever possible.
An FIR that had been filed against a man who was accused of gazing at a woman while they were both on a flight was dismissed by the Delhi High Court after the two parties reached a mutually agreeable settlement. The judge decided that prolonging the proceedings would not achieve any beneficial outcome and could be seen as an abuse of process.
Introduction The Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Union of India v. Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd. on June 5,…
The Honourable Supreme Court established the fact that provided there is circumstantial evidence in the case, it would suffice to convict the person of an offence provided the circumstances when joined together creates a complete and unbroken chain of guilt. Maintaining the decision made by the Chetan case, the Supreme Court has taken into consideration important precedents, supporting the view that the credible circumstantial evidence provided, together with inability of the accused to signify the facts that proved his guilt are enough to convict the case without direct witnesses.
Online applications are being accepted by the Supreme Court of India for a total of twenty Junior Court Assistant-cum-Junior Programmer vacancies and six Senior Court Assistant-cum-Senior Programmer positions. The application deadline for Indian citizens is the 27th of June, 2025. Interviews, written examinations, and practical aptitude tests are all components of the selection process.
The NCLT admitted an insolvency plea against Anil Ambani’s Reliance Infrastructure, initiating CIRP, but the NCLAT later stayed the process. The case highlights corporate debt challenges and the critical role of tribunals in overseeing fair insolvency proceedings.
In Rahul Gandhi v. State of U.P., the Court of Allahabad held that a genuine ‘aggrieved person’ must exist for criminal defamation. Justice Subhash Vidyarthi affirmed magistrate discretion under Sections 199 and 482 CrPC, judicially limiting quashing to exceptional cases.
The RCB victory parade stampede on June 4, 2025, exposed failures in crowd management and compliance with public gathering laws. Eleven people died and dozens were injured, prompting legal scrutiny under negligence statutes and urgent calls for stricter safety protocols.
Kerala High Court affirmed a widow’s right to reside in her matrimonial home under Section 17 of the DV Act, clarifying that a widow’s domestic relationship with in-laws endures beyond her husband’s death and property ownership cannot nullify this protection.
This article talks about the Supreme Court’s decision to reject the acquittal of a government official accused of bribery. The court reinstated the trial court’s conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, concentrating on the legal principles and evidence issues at hand.
