Impossibility of Enforcing Supreme Court’s Stray Dogs Mandate in Delhi
The new action of the Supreme Court of India on 27 May 2018, to clear of all stray dogs in…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The new action of the Supreme Court of India on 27 May 2018, to clear of all stray dogs in…
The Supreme Court of India has given an important verdict in the case of Kamal Gupta & Anr. Vs. M/S…
A recent decision pronounced by the Supreme Court of India threw light on regard to stringent conditions to be established…
The Tarr Facts The Facts of the Case The murder which was a case of State of Karnataka vs Sri…
This is a significant call by taxpayers and officials. The Supreme Court of India has in a very important decision…
In a recent case the Supreme Court of India in a case called Sanjit Singh Salwan & Ors. V. Sardar…
An interim stay has been given by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on a crucial matter in the Land…
https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2025/32670/32670_2025_8_1504_63019_Judgement_05-Aug-2025.pdf Presided by: Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Sandeep Mehta, Supreme Court Appellant: Union of India & Ors. Respondent: S. Subramaniyan…
The Supreme Court made it clear that regulatory assets are only expected to be very rare, limited to only 3% annually of revenue, and to be fully recovered in 3 years for new or later assets and 5 years for existing or prior assets. Regulatory Commissions are expected to set up cost-reflective tariffs and equally manage regulatory assets in a fully transparent manner and subject to rules and policies. The judgment imposes strict accountability, and has empowered APTEL to ensure compliance and control against regulatory failure.
https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2025/32670/32670_2025_8_1504_63019_Judgement_05-Aug-2025.pdf Presided by: Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Sandeep Mehta, Supreme Court Appellant: Narayan YadavRespondent: State of Chhattisgarh In a recent…