The threat of fraud and corruption in the sphere of medical education is a serious factor which inflicts the fundamental safety of healthcare systems. In this context, the recent happenings with regards to a possible bribery deal involving an assessor of the National Medical Commission (NMC) brings into focus the jurisprudence in India that is built to fight such malpractices. It discusses the details of this case and the punishments that can be imposed by the Indian jails concerning the act of corruption, especially in the act laid down in the year 1988 namely the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and what the NMC has done.
The Bribery Alleged Incident
A senior doctor was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in May 2025 and he was performing the role of an Assessor at the National Medical Commission (NMC). The arrest was done as soon as the doctor had accepted a dowry of INR 10 lakhs. It was claimed that this payment was exchanged by a favorable assessment report on a particular private medical college in Karnataka. In this case the CBI filed an FIR (First Information Report) against some of the assessors, college officials and other unknown people in regard to this so called bribery. It is still under investigation.
Later research has found a wider network. The CBI has registered FIRs against 34 people which includes the officials of the Union Health Ministry and the NMC, private persons and leaders of institutions. The purported modus operandi was illegal propagation of confidential information on regulation, distortion of statutory inspection procedures and accepting of bribes. This also involved informing colleges and assessor names in advance of inspection times in order to allow them to time to prepare fake faculty and make-believe patients so that compliances can be shown. The bribes are said to have been channeled by the help of middlemen and a certain part of the money that was obtained illegally was reportedly spent on personal projects.
The National Medical Commission (NMC) Role
NMC is the supreme authority medical education and practice in the country of India. It assigns senior faculty members of different government medical colleges to do routine checks of medical institutions. These are assessors not directly hired by the NMC and are picked by way of randomization. The inspections play the amazing role in evaluating the evidence needed to determine the medical colleges comply with the minimum required essential standards of undergraduate and postgraduate medical education and in approval of increases in numbers of seats.
Tight measures were taken by the NMC as soon as the alleged bribery was revealed. The Commission has openly declared that it would take action to uphold integrity and transparency and that it will have a no tolerance policy to corruption.
Sanctions Taking Placed by the NMC
As the reaction to the supposed case of bribery, the NMC has done the following, which is deemed as exemplary:
Blacklisting of the Assessor: The elderly physician who took part in the supposed bribery case has now been blacklisted by the NMC. This step follows the investigation that is still underway and the ultimate decision in the criminal case.
Penalties to the Medical College: There has been rigorous punishment to the concerned group of the medical college which was charged with the bribery. NMC has resolved that no renewal of current undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) seat will be done in the year 2025-2026. Moreover, any applications this college gives to this college to increase the number of seats, introduce new UG and PG courses to come up in AY 2025-26, submitted are cancelled hence, not to be processed.
These measures of the NMC are in the framework of its power to initiate fines, block a new program application processing, decrease the student population, and prevent course enrollment, according to corresponding penal clauses of the NMC Act and its regulations.
Law/regulation: Prevention of corruption Act, 1988
The major law -The Prevention of corruption act 1988 (PCA) controls anti-corruption in India. This Act outlaws a number of acts of corrupt practices among the public servants as well as the persons who give bribes. The definition of a “public servant” in this Act is people under the service or in the pay of the Government, or people who are receiving any remuneration in the Government to perform any duty to the Government that is in a way public. This term is applied to those who happen to have their services used by a University or any other form of government in the matter of taking or holding examinations or selections, and this would surely include NMC assessors.
The main points of corruption law Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, which apply in such instances can be found in:
- Section 7: Offence by a public servant taking a bribe: This section covers the representations of the public servant taking a bribe. This is a provision of the books of the law where the public servants are considered to take a bribe on their part or accept an undue advantage upon themselves or on the behalf of another person. This offense carries a penalty that involves jail sentence of not less than three years that may rise to seven years in prison, and a fine.
- Part 8: Contravention of bribing of a public servant: This part is concerned with the one who gives or promises to give an undue advantage to another person, with the purpose of getting a certain public servant to appear inappropriately or dishonestly in the performance of a public duty. The penalty is incarceration to a period not exceeding seven years, or to fine, or to both of them. There is a bribe-giver provision in this section that can enjoy immunity when he or she reports the matter to investigating agency within seven days of the date when he or she gave the undue advantage.
- Section 12: Abetment of offences: This section provides punishment on anybody who abets any offence that is punishable under the Act whether such offence is committed in consequence to that abetment or not. The punitive action is incarceration of three to seven years and a fine.
- Section 13: Criminal misconduct by a public servant: This section, especially before the amendment in 2018, defined criminal misconduct, which consisted of dishonest or fraudulent misappropriation of any property vested in that person in their public capacity or illicit enrichment of that person. This was simplified by the 2018 amendment which is based on intentional illicit enrichment. The penalty on misconduct in crimes is imprisonment of minimum four years and extends to ten years and a fine.
- Section 14: Punishment of habitual offender: This part includes provision of an enhanced punishment to repeat offenders under the Act.
- Section 20: Presumption where public servant takes undue advantage: In this section, as an inference, it is mentioned that: in any case, where a public servant takes undue advantage, unless the effect is demonstrated to be contrary, he must be taken to have accepted the advantage as an incentive or reward to do a public duty in improper or undue way. This places the weight of innocence with accused to prove the same.
Court Procedure and Execution
The investigations In the cases falling under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are usually conducted by the CBI or Anti-Corruption Bureaus (ACBs) of the states. Prosecution can be done with prior sanction of central or state government depending upon whom the person is working as a public servant. The Special Judges who could be normal Sessions Judges or Additional Sessions Judges, in the case of Central and State Governments, attempt these cases. Under this Act, trials shall be conducted on a day to day basis and an effort shall be made to ensure that such trial is concluded within a period of two years subject to an extension of a period of six months at a time not exceeding term of four years in aggregate in case of ordinary importance.
It is seen that the eminent NMC bribery issue is under probe and the law process is underway against the law under the prevention of corruption Act. Further arrests and charges are likely to come with the continued investigations as the investigators will be tracing financial tracks and the activities of different intermediaries.
The bribery scandal involving the NMC doctor in the medical college examinations highlights the persisting problems in corruption that are in tender areas. Measures taken against the accused assessor, especially detecting the assessor in blacklisting and subjecting the involved medical college to heavy penalties, show that NMC is keen on preventing such behaviors. At the same time, legal means, enshrined in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, enable the investigative and judicial bodies with the means to prosecute the involved parties in cases of bribery and other corrupt actions, therefore, to preserve transparency and integrity of the medical education. What the current investigation and trials bring up will bear more light into how these anti-corruption measures are to be applied and enforced.
Author
For any queries or to publish an article or post on our platform, please email us at contact@legalmaestros.com.
1 thought on “Anti-Corruption Laws in Action: Penalties for the NMC Doctor’s Alleged Bribe in Medical College Assessments”