Supreme Court Declines to Entertain AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s Petition Challenging Uttar Pradesh Government’s Closure of 105 Primary Schools
With the recent move of the Supreme Court to reject a roding in the case by AAP Member of Parliament,…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
With the recent move of the Supreme Court to reject a roding in the case by AAP Member of Parliament,…
Introduction So, picture this July 15, 2025. The Supreme Court’s got its hands full with a stack of petitions, all…
In this article, we are going to examine the Abdul Hameed v. State case, a landmark judgment explaining anticipatory bail under the new BNSS in India. It focuses on the maintenance of consecutive bail applications, the retrospective effect of procedural legislations such as BNSS and principle of beneficial law in the sense that the evolution of the law legally deserves reconsideration of bail considering the new legal considerations.
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for intervening in a private temple management dispute, forming a takeover trust without stakeholder consent. The Court warned that such executive overreach into civil litigation undermines the rule of law and separation of powers.