Students Aspire to Be Lawyers Like in Suits, Not Maamla Legal Hai: Justice Sanjay Karol
Introduction Recently, a significant proposal was suggested by Allahabad High Court to enhance the operations of government legal offices. The…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Introduction Recently, a significant proposal was suggested by Allahabad High Court to enhance the operations of government legal offices. The…
Introduction The Allahabad High Court has recently offered a valuable proposal that can help to enhance the operations of government…
India is experiencing a profound change in the landscape in terms of law with the creation of the Bharatiya Nyaya…
Justice M.S. Janarthanam, a former judge of the Madras high court led the battle to protect the 69% reservation policy of Tamil Nadu. The laws of social justice in the state and beyond were substantially fortified through his law practice with regards to the sub-quotas and rights of backward classes.
The open confessions by Deepika Padukone about women in Bollywood being offered meager pay and poor working conditions continue to indicate gender discrimination. Such problems pose a great concern in the eyes of the Constitution and labour laws of India, which need alarming modification, legal consequences, and sensitization.
The Public Safety Act empowers senior executive officers to order preventive detention in the name of “public order” or “security of the State.” Under Section 8, a Divisional Commissioner or District Magistrate may detain any person for up to two years if they believe that individual’s activities could disturb peace or incite violence. Detention orders must outline the grounds for arrest within ten days, although Section 13 permits withholding of sensitive details deemed against public interest. Critics argue that such broad discretion enables arbitrary use of power, eroding trust in the legal system.
Once a detention is ordered, Section 16 mandates that an Advisory Board—comprised of members appointed by the State Government—review the case within four weeks. However, detainees are denied access to legal counsel during these proceedings, and the Board’s recommendations are non-binding. Section 22 further shields officials from legal liability for actions taken “in good faith” under the Act. Together, these provisions create a framework where procedural safeguards exist in theory but often falter in practice, leaving detainees with limited recourse to challenge prolonged preventive detention.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, adds Sections 237 to 239 to fight muzzling evidence and shielding criminals, updating the Indian Penal Code. Section 237 criminalizes the making of false declarations, Section 238 aims at tampering with evidence and providing false information to shield criminals, and Section 239 acts against neglect to report crimes. These steps guarantee evidence purity and criminal accountability, crucial for justice. Such cases as Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and learned writings attest to their salience. While issues, such as establishing intent and coping with cyber evidence, still persist, the BNS consolidates the Indian legal architecture.