Centre informs Delhi High Court: With CJI, appointment of NCLT president pending since December 2025.
. Introduction A big question of appointing the President of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) was presented before the…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
. Introduction A big question of appointing the President of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) was presented before the…
After the first SLP contesting the same High Court order was rejected, the Supreme Court of India conducted an investigation into the wrongdoing of counsel who had filed a second SLP challenging the same verdict. Although there was a difference of opinion over the harshness of penalty, the court placed an emphasis on the responsibilities of advocates, the significance of ethical behavior, and the consequences of incorrectly employing legal procedures.
Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 addresses the legal procedure that must be followed in order to declare a person to be absconding if they are able to elude arrest despite the fact that a warrant in their possession has been issued. By ensuring that legal action and public notice are taken, this provision assures that such individuals will be compelled to appear before the court.
The sections 75, 76, and 77 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are broken down into language that is easy to understand in this article. In these sections, the execution of arrest warrants by magistrates, police officers, or other individuals is discussed, along with the processes and legal requirements that are involved in this process.
Sections 66, 67, and 68 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are discussed in this article. The article focuses on the legal procedures that must be followed in order to serve a summons in situations when the person who is being summoned is either unable to be located or is a government employee. It is supplied for clarification that simple illustrations are provided.
In this article, Sections 52 and 53 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which deal with the medical examination of those accused or arrested in connection with rape and other criminal offenses, are broken down in great depth and explained in great detail. Written in straightforward English, it provides an explanation of the legal procedures, the responsibilities of medical experts, and the rights of the accused.
The sections 39, 40, and 41 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which deal with arrest procedures by police, private persons, and Magistrates, are broken down into their component parts and explained in straightforward language in this article. In order to facilitate better comprehension, it discusses legal provisions and the rights of persons, and it also incorporates illustrations from real life.
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 prescribes punishment for murder. It mandates life imprisonment or death sentence upon conviction, reflecting society’s gravest condemnation of intentional unlawful killing.
Section 23 of The Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961, regulates suits over movable property in Rajasthan, India. It prescribes the mode of valuation for ascertaining court fees in suits over movable property. According to the section, the fee is calculated using the market value of the movable property in question, in a bid to provide a uniform method of litigation expenses. This provision seeks to simplify judicial procedures, improve accessibility, and ensure fairness in legal proceedings related to movable property. Its application is important for litigants and courts in determining reasonable fees.
This abstract analyzes Sections 9 and 10 of the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961, relating to court fee determination in Rajasthan. Section 9 deals with documents coming within more than one fee description and provides for the highest fee where it applies, with special over general descriptions having priority. Section 10 requires plaintiffs to provide a comprehensive statement of the subject-matter of the suit and value for market-value-based fees, guaranteeing proper fee evaluation. Such provisions simplify judicial procedures, improve transparency, and make fee computation standardized.