No Law Bars Media from Disclosing Accused’s Name: Sikkim High Court
Introduction The Sikkim High Court has made a significant legal stance by saying that there exists no absolute law that…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Introduction The Sikkim High Court has made a significant legal stance by saying that there exists no absolute law that…
Anticipatory bail sought by cartoonist Hemant Malviya was refused by Madhya Pradesh High Court, holding that his caricature of RSS and Prime Minister outraged religious feelings. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary under strict provisions safeguarding public harmony and societal stability.
In this post the case of the Delhi High Court handling the deception around the Patanjali Chyawanprash advertisement is analysed in view of its legal precedent related to false efficacy claims and disparagement. It goes into the pace of development of commercial speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian constitution, the landmark cases which outline its extent and restriction in advertising.
Delhi High Court decision on Dabur v Patanjali enlightened the Ayurvedic medicines with regard to advertising. It highlighted the need for tighter truthfulness on health products as the ads were considered by Patanjali as demeaning on Dabur Chyawanprash and other brands. The court also noted how misleading comparisons are not permissible and fair competition should be guarded against.