New Delhi, India -July 21, 2025- In a major and bold action that shook the entire world of aviation and media community, the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has served legal notices to two of the most powerful media houses in the world viz. Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. The strong voice of Indian pilots raises the allegation that the international media houses did a selective and unconfirmed reporting on disaster crashing of the Air India flight 171. This disastrous event happened on June 12, 2025 in the Ahmedabad that took away the lives of 260 people. The FIP is not only looking forward to a correction; it is requesting a public apology and a complete withdrawal of the controversial reports and stating that the content of the reports has caused grievous and irreparable damage on the name of the dead pilots as well as massively tortured their bereaved families.
Introduction to The Tragic Incident and Preliminary Results
Air India Flight 171 was a one of the new Boeing 787 Dreamliners, scheduled to fly to London, but it crashed soon after the plane had departed Ahmedabad. Many passengers and ground persons died because the plane ended up losing all except one of the 242 on board and 19 ground persons. The level of the tragedy at once caused an aviation investigation at a high level in the Bureau of aircraft accident investigation of India (AAIB).
The first report given out by the AAIB was slated out about a month after the accident and gave light into the perimeter events which resulted in the calamity. The report singled out an important point, that engine fuel control switches moved to the “CUTOFF” position which is nearly in union with the one that has been moved to the “RUN” position. This abrupt shutdown of fuel stream directly preconditioned this full loss of thrust of both engines, which is something pilots practice avoiding diligently. The initial reports also cited the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) information, and in the transgreive, one of the pilots asked the other whether the fuel cutoff was done, but the latter denied such a thing. Importantly, the initial assessment of AAIB was expressed in such a way as not to pass any judgments or provide any definitive causes of the occurrence of such switch movements at the same time so it was made clear that the investigation was far too young to make any pronunciations.
For More Updates & Regular Notes Join Our Whats App Group (https://chat.whatsapp.com/DkucckgAEJbCtXwXr2yIt0) and Telegram Group ( https://t.me/legalmaestroeducators ) contact@legalmaestros.com.
Grievance by FIP: Having the Unverified Reporting and Jumping to Conclusions
It is on the premises of the continuing and complex enquiry that the decisive legal action by the FIP has been executed. According to reports stated by many leading Indian information agencies, the President of the FIP, Captain C.S. Randhawa, has not been shy in criticizing what he categorically called as untenable and actually inaccurate reporting by Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. He has repeatedly pointed out that these foreign media houses had gone way past the pre-determined findings of the AAIB as posted before them in their zeal to get their stories out. Rather, they allegedly made final conclusions which were not only unsubstantiated but went completely opposite to the official report, with the tone of caution within it.
Such outlets and their ethics have been called into serious question by statements of Captain Randhawa to the masses on a number of occasions. He has firmly told them that they are not the investigative body by saying that they are not the one to determine the cause of such a complex accident. According to him, these media houses ought not to make rush conclusions and issue press statements that end up prejudicing an inquiry case or unduly smearing reputations.
There is a basic objection to the content of the legal notice posted by the FIP that points to reports in these foreign broadcast and print media that based on unnamed sources supposedly privy with the early assessment of evidence by US officials, the captain of flight 171 had disabled the fuel switches willingly. A single report, promulgated widely, insinuated strongly against pilot error, and in particular with naming as the culprit the captain. This news which has been circulated in all parts of the world have triggered a wave of outrage and harsh criticism by almost all pilot associations in India. According to the FIP, not only this highly speculative information is irresponsible, but also extremely irresponsible, when a full and fair investigation is still in progress, and no judgment is reached yet. The legal announcement categorically prohibits the further distribution or even increase in the number of unconfirmed, hypothetical, or unofficial theories, related to the crash but, more to the point, the pilots participating in this incident, where no official confirmation and a final report of the investigating bodies were produced.
The Human Consequences: Hurt and Injury to the Reputation
In addition to the legalities of the inquiry the legal notice of the FIP highlights the emotional and devastating effect such hasty and hypothetical reporting pollutes. The Federation strongly raises the fact that, unfortunately, the dead pilots can no longer protect themselves against these accusations. Hence, such hastiness does not only cause a needless and untold amount of distress to their already afflicted families but also causes an immense hit on the morale and professional status of the entire pilot fraternity. This society, the FIP stresses, lives its life under colossal pressure, immense responsibility to the population, and under the microscope.
The warning issued by the Federation has requested Reuters and its associated websites to stop any form of speculations that might take place on the core cause of the crash or rather that might lay blame on an individual especially the flight crewmen. It has also insisted on thorough review and correction of already published articles. This is comprised of the necessity to include proper disclaimers explicitly explaining that their previous coverage was speculative and, more importantly, not to publish anything that directly or indirectly implicates the fault of the pilots in any way without official confirmation of the same. Moreover, FIP has requested the certain public clarification, stating that no final conclusions have been given by the concerned authorities and that those articles that were challenged were based on only secondary and unverified sources.
The broad-based backing of the industry and the worldwide criticism of speculation
This is not the first time that such a dramatic upsurge of a legal nature has taken place but it is a culmination of a wider feeling that has been brewing in the Indian aviation fraternity. This is coupled with a feeling, especially among pilots, that preliminary report itself and later media interpretation has placed an unfair, maybe premature responsibility on the flight crew. Both the Airline Pilots Association of India (ALPA) and the Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA), the important professional groups, had already protested vehemently against the preliminary report, as it had highlighted possible procedural causes and apparent biasness against the pilot error. They have overwhelmingly denied the hint of Helmet suicide or intentional misconduct indicating stringent psychological and professional vetting procedures all business pilots undergo with the course of their profession.
Giving a lot of credibility and international durability to the sturdy position of FIP, Jennifer Homendy, the Chairwoman of the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made an authoritative statement in the recent press, publicly expressing her disaffection with the manner in which the investigation of the Air India Flight 171 crash has been reported across the globe. She clearly stated that, the center is late and speculative on media reports on the Air India 171 crash. Homendy hit hard on the fact that investigations of such huge magnitude take time and can never be done hastily because thoroughness cannot have coordinated time. She also went on to say how the NTSB had strongly concurred with the public appeal made by the AAIB regarding the need to conduct ranges in reporting, and will extend its services and expertise to the AAIB in its investigation, and all inquisitions and investigative requests are directed to and must be answered by the Indian authorities. Such a strong recommendation by one of the most recognized international aviation safety organizations is huge confirmation of the firm stand of the FIP against speculative and unsubstantiated reporting.
A Precedent-making Problem
The legal alert issued by the FIP is an indication that it will be determined in its effort to safeguard the professional and public image of the pilot fraternity. The Federation has also not spared a chance to make it absolutely clear that in the event that Reuters and The Wall Street Journal do not give in to their demands, they are even ready to take them to any other legal recourse. These possible acts can be the defamation suits, compensation of mental suffering, damages on reputation of the pilots who died and their families.
This amazing new trend highlights the fast growing conflict between the insatiable desire to spread the news as soon as possible in the digital era, and the dire need of proper, responsible, and confirmable news reporting. This conflict is especially sharp in very sensitive and complicated areas such as the investigation of aviation accidents when the final facts may take long to be known and early conclusions may be very costly. The entire international aviation world, not to mention the legal academics and other observers of the media world around the world, will be certainly eager to follow the proceedings and the unprecedented legal issue with enormous fascination, as it might bear significant precedences on how in future such major tragedies would be presented in the media.
Author
About the Author
