Supreme Court

Schools Are Not Businesses, Can’t Harass Students for Fees: Delhi HC

Schools Are Not Businesses, Can't Harass Students for Fees: Delhi HC

Schools Are Not Businesses, Can’t Harass Students for Fees: Delhi HC

Dileep Poshwal June 7, 2025

On June 5, 2025, the Delhi High Court made a big decision that strongly criticized Delhi Public...

Delhi High Court Upholds Objections to Two CLAT PG 2025 Questions, Orders Result Revision

Delhi High Court Upholds Objections to Two CLAT PG 2025 Questions, Orders Result Revision

Delhi High Court Upholds Objections to Two CLAT PG 2025 Questions, Orders Result Revision

Dileep Poshwal June 7, 2025

The Delhi High Court on June 6, 2025, upheld objections to two CLAT PG 2025 questions, deeming...

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in Dhanya M vs State of Kerala by Justices Sanjay Karol, Justices Manmohan

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in Dhanya M vs State of Kerala by Justices Sanjay Karol, Justices Manmohan

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in Dhanya M vs State of Kerala by Justices Sanjay Karol, Justices Manmohan

Legal Maestros June 6, 2025

The order of preventive detention that had been issued against Rajesh, a financial operator in Kerala, was...

Madras HC: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Make Families Even Without Same-Sex Marriage Law

Madras HC: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Make Families Even Without Same-Sex Marriage Law

Madras HC: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Make Families Even Without Same-Sex Marriage Law

Legal Maestros June 6, 2025

Despite the fact that there is no legislation governing marriages between people of the same gender, the...

Supreme Court Upholds Threat-Based Extortion Charge Under Section 387 IPC, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Offence Completeness Without Delivery in Balaji Traders v. State of U.P.

Supreme Court Upholds Threat-Based Extortion Charge Under Section 387 IPC, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Offence Completeness Without Delivery in Balaji Traders v. State of U.P.

Supreme Court Upholds Threat-Based Extortion Charge Under Section 387 IPC, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Offence Completeness Without Delivery in Balaji Traders v. State of U.P.

Dileep Poshwal June 6, 2025

The Supreme Court held that threatening harm to extort money constitutes an offence under Section 387 IPC,...

Supreme Court Reprimands Haryana Chief Secretary: How Failure to Curb Illegal Road Construction in Forests

supreme court reprimands haryana chief secretary: how failure to curb illegal road construction in forests

Supreme Court Reprimands Haryana Chief Secretary: How Failure to Curb Illegal Road Construction in Forests

Dileep Poshwal June 6, 2025

The Supreme Court sharply reprimanded the Haryana Chief Secretary for inaction over an unauthorized road through reserved...

Madras High Court: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Form Families Even Without Legal Marriage Madras HC: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Make Families Even Without Same-Sex Marriage Law

Madras HC: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Make Families Even Without Same-Sex Marriage Law

Madras High Court: LGBTQ+ Couples Can Form Families Even Without Legal Marriage

Legal Maestros June 6, 2025

Following a peaceful resolution between the two parties, the First Information Report (FIR) that had been filed...

Why Delhi High Court Quashed Case Against Man Over Staring Allegation

Why Delhi High Court Quashed Case Against Man Over Staring Allegation

Why Delhi High Court Quashed Case Against Man Over Staring Allegation

Legal Maestros June 6, 2025

An FIR that had been filed against a man who was accused of gazing at a woman...

Supreme Court Upholds Post-Delivery Penalty Powers Under Section 66 of Railways Act, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Legislative Intent in Union of India v. Kamakhya Transport

Supreme Court Upholds Post-Delivery Penalty Powers Under Section 66 of Railways Act, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Legislative Intent in Union of India v. Kamakhya Transport

Supreme Court Upholds Post-Delivery Penalty Powers Under Section 66 of Railways Act, Justice Sanjay Karol Emphasizes Legislative Intent in Union of India v. Kamakhya Transport

Dileep Poshwal June 6, 2025

Introduction The Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Union of India v. Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd....

Supreme Court Ruling by Justice M.B. Snehalatha Affirms That Widow Retains Right to Matrimonial Home Despite Husband’s Death Under Domestic Violence Act

Supreme Court Ruling by Justice M.B. Snehalatha Affirms That Widow Retains Right to Matrimonial Home Despite Husband’s Death Under Domestic Violence Act

Supreme Court Ruling by Justice M.B. Snehalatha Affirms That Widow Retains Right to Matrimonial Home Despite Husband’s Death Under Domestic Violence Act

Dileep Poshwal June 5, 2025

Kerala High Court affirmed a widow’s right to reside in her matrimonial home under Section 17 of...