Personality Rights in India: Between Judicial Intuition and Doctrinal Drift
In November 2022, the Delhi High Court was approached by Amitabh Bachan for protection of his personality rights which included…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
In November 2022, the Delhi High Court was approached by Amitabh Bachan for protection of his personality rights which included…
What makes this matter worse is the fact that this motion is rooted less in clear cases of judicial bias but more on the fact that the State Government was dissatisfied with the judicial outcome which touched upon sensitive religious and political terrain. If legislation started acting on every dissatisfaction it has it will set a wrong precedent ad risks judiciary being subordinated to shifting winds of politics.
Introduction On 1st December 2025 Apex Court issued notice in a PIL filed by Sameeksha foundation by Mr. Devansh Srivastava as…
These examples show how India is experimenting with AI. Debate continues on scope: some media reports even discuss “AI judges” for minor cases to clear backlogs, but authorities have clarified on multiple occasions that AI will assist human judges, not replace them.
Yet the criticisms are equally substantial. Trade unions say the reforms weaken collective bargaining and dilute job security particularly due to easier retrenchment rules and wider employer discretion. Several states have delayed rolling out their rules, citing insufficient consultation and practical challenges.
Introduction Chief Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai’s tenure as the 52nd Chief Justice of India lasted a bit more than six…
The substantive part of Article 200 which employs three verbs that indicate the
options of the Governor which are to assent, withhold, and reserve a bill and the proviso of
the same article were given weigh rather than implied reading of the Constitution.
On 13 November 2025, Supreme Court ordered Bombay High Court for fresh consideration in a matter involving application of Section…
In order to enforce the rule that a defendant must first establish a right against the plaintiff before any incidental claims against co-defendants can be entertained, the Court also cited Rajul Mano Shah v. Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth [(2025) 10 SCR 152].