Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Rajasthan High Court has recently issued a major verdict in case of unfair refusal of promotion of an employee named…
The High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur recently dealt with an important scenario of the indefinite strike…
Introduction to the Case Alright, here’s the rewrite: So, here’s the deal: this article dives into a pretty wild case…
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that the CBI Director had gone against Supreme Court orders in appointing an officer from the previously disbanded SIT to the current Tirupati laddu probe. The Court granted a writ petition by accused Kaduru Chinnappanna and directed the probe be done only by the reconstituted SIT, in accordance with the Supreme Court. This decision enforces judicial control over investigation processes and maintains the precedence of ensuring compliance with apex court orders in sensitive public issues.
What the Case Actually Is Satyakey Ashok Savarkar, his family, and another individual who made the decision that he would…
The Bombay High Court has issued an ex-parte interim order restraining Bihar-based lawyer Sonu Nigam Singh from impersonating acclaimed singer Sonu Nigam on X. Justice R.I. Chagla directed Singh to display his full name on his X profile after the singer’s petition highlighted misleading communal and political posts that sparked online backlash and confusion
The Gujarat High Court has granted a one-month extension of temporary bail to Asaram, convicted in multiple rape cases, citing medical reasons. The court made it clear that this would be the final extension and no further relief would be considered.
In Kaduru Chinnappanna v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court ruled that only the Supreme Court‑constituted SIT may investigate, holding any extra‑SIT nominations void and reinforcing strict compliance with apex court orders to ensure a fair, independent inquiry.
Oh man, in P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandass, the court basically called out the advocate for breaking his promise to vacate the place—yeah, that’s civil contempt, no question. The judges weren’t messing around; they made it super clear: play games with court orders, stall for time, try to be clever? Nope. That kind of stuff’s gonna get you punished. Gotta respect the court’s word, or face the music.
Ajmer court has taken cognizance of a criminal complaint against Drishti IAS founder Vikas Divyakirti for allegedly making sarcastic and defamatory comments about the judiciary in a viral video. He has been summoned to appear personally on July 22 for apparent offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and IT Act.
