Keeping Pace with Legal Change
In order to enforce the rule that a defendant must first establish a right against the plaintiff before any incidental claims against co-defendants can be entertained, the Court also cited Rajul Mano Shah v. Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth [(2025) 10 SCR 152].
Recently, the Supreme Court of India answered a crucial question of whether an entry made in the balance sheet of…
In a recent treatise, the Supreme Court of India of India held that the Limitation Act 1963 is applicable to…
Justices Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N. Bhatti ruled that time-barred will disputes under the Limitation Act cannot proceed, emphasizing that the limitation period starts when the cause of action arises, not upon full knowledge. Ancillary reliefs also become unenforceable if the primary relief is time-barred.
In the case of New Mangalore Port Trust v. Clifford D’Souza, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 2025, the primary question that was being considered was whether or not demands for past dues under a new licensing price could be filed after a delay. This article provides this explanation.
