Keeping Pace with Legal Change
This paper presents a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of India on the acquisition of land and the unjust…
According to the Supreme Court, criminal proceedings against Brij Bhushan in a land transaction that occurred several decades ago were dismissed because there was no evidence of fraud, there was no personal gain, and there was no criminal intent. In accordance with land reform regulations, the Court stressed the limitations of criminal prosecution provisions.
The verdict handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kishan v. State of Haryana in 2025 is dissected in this article. Particular attention is paid to the topics of land acquisition, equitable compensation, and judicial reasoning concerning similar land valuation. In accordance with the Land Acquisition Act, the verdict places an emphasis on providing landowners with equitable treatment.
This abstract discusses appeal fees and compensation orders under the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961, with emphasis on Sections 46 and 47. Section 46 lays down fees for filing appeals, based on the value of the subject matter or relief claimed, to provide equal access to appellate courts. Section 47 of fees and procedure regarding compensation orders is relevant for matters such as land acquisition or compensation for damage, where equity ensures cost reasonable apportionment. Their study provides implications regarding Rajasthan’s litigants by pointing out provisions of the statutes, fee levies, and efficiency of adjudications in disputations.
