Justice Milind Jadhav Rejects Recusal in Tenancy Case, Fines Petitioner ₹50,000 for Raising Corruption Allegations Against Him
Justice Milind N. Jadhav of the Bombay High Court declined an application of his recusal, in a case of an…
Tag: judicial integrity
CJI Gavai Stresses Supreme Court’s Independence from Chief Justice Dominance
The third pillar of the largest democracy of the world which is known as the Indian judiciary plays its role…
Preserving Judicial Integrity: Why Justice Sanjiv Khanna Rejected Post-Retirement Assignments
The fact that Justice Sanjiv Khanna has decided to turn down all post-retirement appointments is evidence of his steadfast dedication to upholding the highest standards of judicial integrity. Furthermore, his position underlines that the highest judicial post carries responsibilities that extend beyond the bench, which is particularly important in this day and age, when public faith in institutions can be difficult to maintain. This individual has established a tremendous example for future jurists by refusing to accept the trappings of power once his tenure came to an end. His judgment kicks off an important conversation about the steps that must be taken in order to protect the independence of the judicial system and the trust that society places in those who are responsible for its protection. By doing so, Justice Khanna has not only paid tribute to the legacy of his ancestors, but he has also paved the way for future generations of judges to follow in his footsteps by establishing a route that is guided by principles.
Understanding Suit Valuation and Objections in Rajasthan (Section 48 & 49)
This abstract explores suit valuation and objections under the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961, specifically Sections 48 and 49. Section 48 authorizes courts to fix the proper valuation of suits where there is a dispute, providing for proper fee determination. Section 49 provides for objections to valuation or jurisdiction by parties, ensuring procedural fairness. The critique is marked by highlighting their part in upholding judicial integrity, avoiding under- or over-valuation, and resolving litigant complaints in the legal system of Rajasthan, with a focus on statutory directives and practical realities.