Flash News
CJI Surya Kant Issues Public Right to Commute Warning Forcing Partial Reopening of Mandi House and Central Secretariat
Supreme Court Sets July 29 Hearing After Muslim Side Claims Allocated Bhojshala Namaz Site Requires Helicopters to Reach
Ministry of Home Affairs Invokes Section 69A of IT Act to Force GitHub Block on Decentralised App Bitchat
Supreme Court to Hear Petitions Against Police Crackdown on Student Protesters After CJI Surya Kant Said He does not have time
Criminal Action Initiated Against Ousted NTA Personnel While Protesters Demand Constitutional Accountability From Dharmendra Pradhan

Grid Posts

View All
Supreme Court

Can criminal proceedings under FERA be sustained without complying withsection 61(2) and despite an inordinate delay? (2026 INSC 727)

byGarima Jain
Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Justices P. S. Narasimha and Manoj Misra Partly Allow Appeals in Family Dispute Culpable Homicide Case

byLegal Maestros
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Judgment by Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Manoj Misra Modifies Conviction in Culpable Homicide Case

byLegal Maestros
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Judgment by Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Manoj Misra Quashes Criminal Case Against Doctor

byLegal Maestros
Current Legal Update

Comedy vs. Courtroom: Freedom of Speech and Expression in Stand-Up Comedy

The Indian stand-up comedians’ legal woes merely echo a grander conflict between liberty of expression and the limits set by law and society. While humour has been employed since time immemorial as a mode of social and political commentary, it is being perceived more and more as a threat to authority. The case of Kunal Kamra, Munawar Faruqui, and Mohit Morani serves to demonstrate the dangers comedians court if they are at all critical of authority or religious sentiments.

byLegal Maestros
CRIMINAL LAW

Section 11 and 12 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Provisions and Limits on Solitary Confinement

Sections 11 and 12 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, offer a systemic approach to the application of solitary confinement. The law ensures that solitary confinement shall be imposed only for short durations and with proper intervals, so as not to cause unnecessary suffering. By controlling how and when solitary confinement is to be applied, these provisions demonstrate commitment to upholding fairness and humanity in the criminal justice system.

byLegal Maestros
Current Legal Update

The Rise of Bulldozer Justice in India: Legal Analysis, Supreme Court Rulings, and Constitutional Concerns

Bulldozer justice has caught on in India because of its instant effect and powerful political statement. Its deployment, however, is problematic with serious legal and ethical implications in terms of due process and constitutional rights. Again and again, the Supreme Court has held that demolitions must not be applied as a mode of punishment and must adhere to proper legal formalities. While the call for rapid action against criminals is understandable, it should not be at the expense of core legal principles. Guaranteeing fair trials, bolstering the judiciary, and upholding the rule of law are important to avoid the abuse of power and ensure justice for all citizens.

byLegal Maestros
Current Legal Update

Legal Battles and Political Interference in Indian Sports Federations: The Need for Governance Reforms

Legal complexities of Indian sport federations, frequently based on political interference, mismanagement, and power struggles within the organization, have severely crippled the development of sports across India. Failure in governance has resulted in fiscal losses, uncertainty for sportspersons, and reputational loss at the international stage. Judicial intervention, though beneficial in disentangling some situations, calls for long-term solutions based on structural reforms where transparency and professionalism stand above political agendas.

byLegal Maestros
Current Legal Update

Justice B.R. Gavai and Supreme Court Delegation Visit Manipur to Enhance Relief and Legal Assistance

The tour of Justice B.R. Gavai and the Supreme Court delegation to Manipur was an important move in tackling the humanitarian and legal issues that have resulted from the long-standing ethnic strife in the state.

By directly interfacing with displaced groups, opening up legal and medical relief programs, and easing access to vital services, the judiciary expressed renewed commitment towards justice and relief.

While the road to lasting peace remains complex, such interventions serve as a beacon of hope for the affected populations, reinforcing faith in legal institutions and the nation’s collective ability to restore normalcy.

byLegal Maestros
CRIMINAL LAW

Understanding Sections 9 and 10 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Sections 9 and 10 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, provide that punishments should be just and proportionate. Section 9 avoids excessive punishment for offenses which are part of a single offense, so that an individual is punished for the composite offense and not for every component part. It also makes a distinction between offenses which are connected and offenses which are separate to provide fair sentencing. Section 10 offers relief against uncertainty so that an accused person is penalized for the lowest offense in situations of doubt. Such provisions secure justice by inhibiting harsh and unjust punishments, affirming that sentencing should be reasonable and well-balanced.

byLegal Maestros
CRIMINAL LAW

Section 4 and Section 5 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Explain Different Types of Punishments and Their Commutation

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, provides a systematic framework of punishments to deliver justice. It harmonizes harsh punishments with equity by enabling the government to alter sentences when needed. With provisions covering punishments from death penalties to community service, the law seeks to deliver justice to match the crime’s gravity as well as permit mercy and reconsideration in meritorious cases.

byadvocatehmishra@gmail.com