Keeping Pace with Legal Change
As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, a bank employee who has been terminated from their position and is entitled to terminal benefits is able to make a claim for a pension if they are otherwise eligible under the regulations. Clarification was provided by the Court about the relationship between pension requirements and settlement terms.
In the case of New Mangalore Port Trust v. Clifford D’Souza, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 2025, the primary question that was being considered was whether or not demands for past dues under a new licensing price could be filed after a delay. This article provides this explanation.
The verdict handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kishan v. State of Haryana in 2025 is dissected in this article. Particular attention is paid to the topics of land acquisition, equitable compensation, and judicial reasoning concerning similar land valuation. In accordance with the Land Acquisition Act, the verdict places an emphasis on providing landowners with equitable treatment.
In a decisive ruling, the Supreme Court led by Justice Vikram Nath cancelled bail granted to accused in CBI’s probe of May 2021 election violence. The Court cited gravity of communal attack, risk of witness tampering, and integrity of trial.
In a landmark judgment, Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath revised alimony in Sadhukhan v. Sadhukhan, raising maintenance to ₹50,000 monthly with biennial increments, reaffirming the balance between a dependent spouse’s needs and the payer’s realistic capacity under constitutional Indian law.
Introduction A public interest writ petition was filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) over the rehabilitation of…
The Supreme Court mandated a single-shift NEET-PG 2025 exam, addressing fairness concerns over the two-shift format. The decision ensures equitable competition, upholding Article 14’s right to equality, as varying question paper difficulties and normalization issues risked arbitrariness, impacting candidates’ rankings and rights.
Supreme Court in Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust v. UPSIDC affirmed UPSIDC’s cancellation of KNMT’s industrial land allotment, emphasizing strict contractual compliance, procedural fairness, valid legal notices, transparency, and accountability. The Court underscored the Public Trust Doctrine and restrained appellate interference
The Supreme Court recently launched suo motu contempt proceedings against journalist Ajay Shukla for calling a sitting judge “Godi,” deeming the remark scandalous and undermining judicial dignity. The high-profile case highlights tensions between free speech and protecting the judiciary’s authority.
President’s sweeping 2025 tariffs, justified under emergency powers, were struck down by the U.S. Court of International Trade for violating constitutional limits, specifically the non-delegation doctrine and uniformity clause. The ruling underscores Congress’s role in setting tariffs as a check.
