Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The substantive part of Article 200 which employs three verbs that indicate the
options of the Governor which are to assent, withhold, and reserve a bill and the proviso of
the same article were given weigh rather than implied reading of the Constitution.
On 13 November 2025, Supreme Court ordered Bombay High Court for fresh consideration in a matter involving application of Section…
Recently the Supreme Court of India made an important contribution to the law on sentencing and Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic…
The judgment that the Supreme Court made on April 17, 2025 in the case of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora and Others, which was presided over by Justice J.B. Pardiwala, is analyzed in this article. In it, the facts, significant legislative provisions, and basic concerns are outlined. These include the impact of Sanjeev Deshpande, the meaning of Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act, and Section 216 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
On April 16, 2025, the Supreme Court made a very important decision that cleared K. Shikha Barman of all charges. The court found that there were serious mistakes in the way the case was handled and that the wrong person had been identified under the NDPS Act. The Court stressed that the prosecution did not show the defendant’s identity beyond a reasonable doubt.
