Keeping Pace with Legal Change
JPMorgan Chase is among the oldest, largest and most recognized financial companies in the world. As one of the world's premier investment banking and financial…
In Chhattisgarh, naxalite encounters generate serious questions regarding human rights and constitutional liberties. With an eye toward due process, legal responsibility, and protections under the Indian Constitution and human rights law, this article investigates the contradiction between state security and individual liberties.
An artificial intelligence-generated image showing Rahul Gandhi next to journalist Jyoti Malhotra has sparked fresh worries about deepfake-driven false information in India. This paper looks at how such fabrications could compromise public opinion in media, damage reputations, and skew public debate. Focusing on clauses against false evidence, forgery, and defamation, it investigates the legal remedies accessible under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and takes complementing protections in the Information Technology Act, 2000 into consideration. The study offers a whole picture of India’s developing framework against AI-enabled lies by stressing procedures for punishing makers and distributors of misleading information as well as the responsibilities of intermediaries to remove damaging deepfakes.
Are you a law student or recent graduate looking to gain hands-on legal experience from the comfort of your home?…
By reaffirming CAPFs as Organised Group-A Services (OGAS) in its judgment from 2025, the Supreme Court addressed long-standing complaints of stagnation and IPS deputation, thereby reinforcing constitutional equality in government employment policies. The judgment also mandated uniform service benefits, cadre restructuring, and internal promotions.
The decision that the Supreme Court made in the case of Sameer Sandhir v. CBI (2025) is dissected in this article. Particular attention is paid to the admission of omitted evidence post-chargesheet in accordance with Sections 173(5) and 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as the treatment of electronic evidence in accordance with Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
In the case of Agniraj & Ors. v. State, the Supreme Court overturned convictions that were based on faulty witness testimonies and procedural breaches. This decision reaffirmed the importance of fair trial standards and reasserted the Supreme Court’s appeal jurisdiction under Article 136 in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision that crucial legal and procedural requirements were not completed, the proceedings against Vinod Bihari Lal that were brought under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act were dismissed. The verdict preserves constitutional protections for individuals who have been accused of a crime and strengthens safeguards against the misuse of preventive laws.
This particular case highlights the clarification that the Supreme Court has provided regarding property disputes. It emphasizes that consistent boundaries in legal documents take precedence over clerical errors in survey data, and that superfluous remands should be avoided in order to maintain judicial efficiency and guarantee that justice is delivered in a timely manner.
The purpose of this case study is to investigate the decision that the Supreme Court made in the case of Old Jalukai Village Council v. Kakiho Village. The case focuses on the interaction that exists between traditional tribal practices, constitutional safeguards, and administrative procedures in the process of village recognition within the context of Nagaland’s distinct socio-legal systems and territorial boundaries.
Unregistered documents are not allowed to transfer property title, according to the Supreme Court’s ruling, which also reaffirmed the jurisdiction of civil courts in cases involving ownership disputes. The complaint was reinstated, drawing attention to the fact that major title issues must be tried in court and cannot be dismissed on the basis of procedural technicalities.
