Keeping Pace with Legal Change
A legal challenge is underway against MS Dhoni’s “Captain Cool” trademark. Opponents argue the phrase is too generic for exclusive ownership, even for a celebrity. They contend fame alone shouldn’t secure a common term, raising questions about distinctiveness and proper trademark use.
The Kerala High Court instructed the CBFC to issue a censor certificate for the Malayalam movie JSK: Janaki v/s State of Kerala, denying excessive censorship for alleged religious insensitivity. The court ruled that minor alterations were adequate and stressed that artistic freedom under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) should not be stifled by subjective criteria. The decision is an important precedent balancing creative expression with communal sensibility within constitutional limits.
In a milestone ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration permission to move forward with far-reaching federal employee reductions that could affect hundreds of thousands of workers and government services pending litigation. The decision is a major victory for Trump’s agenda in his second term but poses deep constitutional and governance questions.
In a dramatic reform initiative, the government of India has directed all ministries and departments to reduce avoidable litigation, enhance legal cells, and adopt alternative dispute resolution in order to decongest courts and enhance governance effectiveness.
The Delhi High Court ruled on the Chile-Peru “Pisco” naming dispute, directing the GI for Peru be “Peruvian Pisco” and Chile’s application for “Chilean Pisco” be processed. This decision, under The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, clarifies homonymous GIs, preventing consumer confusion.
X (formerly Twitter) claims the Indian government ordered blocking of over 2,000 accounts, including Reuters, under Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000. This escalates debate on online censorship, press freedom, and government powers, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives on the issue.
The tragic Air India Flight AI171 crash in Ahmedabad is under investigation by India’s AAIB, guided by ICAO’s Annex 13. This report details the accident, the role of black boxes, and international collaboration with NTSB, Boeing, and GE, aiming to prevent future tragedies.
By Justice Katju, former Judge of Indian Supreme Court
In a landmark decision for maritime law and environmental responsibility, Kerala High Court has issued a conditional arrest of the…
The present article explores judicial consequences of false rape complaints in the Indian law by looking into evidential provisions of IPC and CrPC. It specifies provisions on misleading information such as 182 and 211 IPC and their implications to complainants. The article also emphasizes legal protection and evidence playing the most important role in proving falsity.
