Current Legal Update

Escalating COVID-19 Cases in India Highlight Need for Robust Legal Provisions in Epidemic Control Acts

The most recent increase of COVID-19 cases across a number of Indian states highlights the vulnerabilities that exist within the legal system that governs public health in the country. In spite of the fact that the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 and the Disaster Management Act of 2005 have played a significant role in previous outbreaks, the provisions of these laws are currently being tested by the problems of the modern era. This article provides an analysis of the constraints that exist in terms of regulation clarity, means for enforcement, intergovernmental coordination, and protections for citizens. It recommends amending some parts, such as Section 2 of the Epidemic Diseases Act and parts 6 and 10 of the Disaster Management Act, in order to improve certain portions. These revisions would clarify responsibilities, increase penalties for non-compliance, and guarantee that decision-making is transparent. When pandemics occur, it is imperative that robust legislative reforms be implemented in order to protect public health and human freedoms.

Current Legal Update

Amit Malviya and Arnab Goswami Face FIR for False Congress Office Claim in Turkey: A Look at Goswami’s History of Alleged Fake News Cases

Two individuals have been mentioned in a First Information Report (FIR) that was submitted by the Indian National Congress. These individuals are Amit Malviya, who is the head of the social media unit for the BJP, and Arnab Goswami, who is the editor-in-chief of Republic TV. According to the allegations made in the lawsuit, they disseminated a false allegation regarding the existence of an office of the Indian National Congress in the Istanbul Congress Centre in Turkey. This article investigates the specifics of the First Information Report (FIR) and traces a pattern in Arnab Goswami’s career, showing multiple instances in the past in which his reporting met with claims of providing false information. While we are evaluating these incidents, we are also taking into consideration the more general difficulty of ensuring that Indian news media are responsible and accurate.

Current Legal Update

BJP’s Modern-Age Mir Jafar Accusation Against Rahul Gandhi Sparks Defamation Debate Under BNS Section 356

A recent statement made by leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) referring to Rahul Gandhi as “modern-day Mir Jafar” has caused a stir. This article provides an explanation of the meaning of the term “defamation” in Indian law and provides an overview of Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which addresses the issue of defamation. This study investigates whether or not the act of labeling a political leader as a “traitor” could satisfy the legal requirements for defamation. When discussing defamation, the discussion refers to decisions made by the Supreme Court as well as major cases. As part of the study, viewpoints from legal experts and political pundits are taken into consideration. The analysis compares the right to free speech with the right to reputation. In addition to this, it discusses political reactions and the manner in which defamation claims are processed in Indian politics.

Current Legal Update

Supreme Court’s Three-Year Legal Practice Ruling Likely to Face Review Petition from Judiciary Coaching Members

The Supreme Court of India has ordered that in order for candidates to be qualified for entry-level judicial officer jobs, they must have a minimum of three years of experience working as advocates in the legal field. In contrast to the policy that had been in place for the past two decades and permitted recent law school graduates to compete for these positions, this decision represents a significant adjustment. It is the intention of this order to ensure that new judicial officers have real legal expertise, which will ultimately lead to an improvement in the quality and integrity of the judicial system. This move, on the other hand, has prompted disputes among members of the judiciary coaching community and those who are seeking to become judges. These individuals claim that it may create barriers for first-generation lawyers and impede the admission of fresh talent into justice. The ramifications of the decision made by the Supreme Court, the arguments in favor of and against the mandatory practice requirement, and the potential impact on the future of judicial recruiting in India are all discussed in this article.

Current Legal Update

Stalin v Modi : Tamil Nadu’s Legal Battle in Supreme Court for ₹2291 Crore Samagra Shiksha Funds Release

Tamil Nadu’s Chief Minister M.K. Stalin moved the Supreme Court seeking release of ₹2,291 crore under the Samagra Shiksha scheme, arguing statutory entitlement. The Centre cited procedural lapses for withholding funds. The Court ordered partial release and timelines for compliance, underlining the balance between federal cooperation and accountability.

Current Legal Update

Akshay Kumar Sues Paresh Rawal for ₹25 Crore: Alleged Breach of Contract Under Indian Contract Act in Hera Pheri 3 Fallout

Bollywood star Akshay Kumar is suing Paresh Rawal for ₹25 crore, alleging breach of contract after the actor exited Hera Pheri 3. Kumar’s production house claims Rawal’s departure violated their agreement, causing delays, reshoot costs, and revenue losses, seeking damages under Sections 39 and 73 of the Indian Contract Act.

Current Legal Update

Haryana YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra’s Espionage Case: NIA and IB Probe Pakistan Links Under Official Secrets Act

In accordance with the Official Secrets Act and the Bhartiya Naya Sanhita, YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was based in Haryana, was taken into custody on May 16, 2025, on the suspicion that he was spying for Pakistan. She is accused of acquiring sensitive information on her travels to Kashmir, Ladakh, and other locations around the world and then sharing it with Pakistani handlers because she is known for her travel channel called “Travel with JO.” An investigation on her connections to a wider espionage network is being conducted by the National Investigation Agency and the Intelligence Bureau. This investigation is looking into her travel history, digital communications, and financial transactions. This article investigates the circumstances behind her detention, including the background of the case, the legal framework, the advancements in the investigation, and the ramifications for national security.

Current Legal Update

Government to Amend IBC: New Provisions to Ease CCI Clearance for Resolution Plans Before CoC Approval

The government of India intends to make changes to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in order to reduce the necessity of obtaining approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) prior to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) being able to adopt a resolution plan. This modification is a result of decisions made by the Supreme Court that have caused doubt regarding whether or not CCI clearance is required prior to CoC endorsement for plans that involve company mergers. The purpose of the modification is to simplify the process of resolving insolvency, cut down on delays, and minimize the costs associated with compliance. Through the modification of Section 31(4) of the IBC, the government intends to strike a balance between the necessity of competition oversight and the business wisdom of creditors. This will ensure that recoveries are completed more quickly and that the framework for corporate rescue is more effective.