Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The Delhi High Court on June 6, 2025, upheld objections to two CLAT PG 2025 questions, deeming them ambiguous and unfair. The court directed the Consortium of NLUs to revise the answer key and reissue corrected results at the earliest.
As soon as the CLAT results were announced, students discovered that several Logical Reasoning questions were flawed. The ambiguity of certain puzzles and the lack of clear premises led many to believe their scores were unfairly affected. Within hours, petitions began pouring into high courts in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and other cities. Candidates demanded the removal of disputed questions, correction of answer keys, and reissuance of merit lists. The urgency of admission deadlines heightened the pressure on courts to act quickly. This immediate legal response underscored the high stakes of the exam and the depth of nationwide frustration.
