Keeping Pace with Legal Change
A recent decision pronounced by the Supreme Court of India threw light on regard to stringent conditions to be established…
In the recent years of the (already old) history of Supreme Court of India the case PNB Housing Finance Limited…
Oh man, in P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandass, the court basically called out the advocate for breaking his promise to vacate the place—yeah, that’s civil contempt, no question. The judges weren’t messing around; they made it super clear: play games with court orders, stall for time, try to be clever? Nope. That kind of stuff’s gonna get you punished. Gotta respect the court’s word, or face the music.
Kerala High Court affirmed a widow’s right to reside in her matrimonial home under Section 17 of the DV Act, clarifying that a widow’s domestic relationship with in-laws endures beyond her husband’s death and property ownership cannot nullify this protection.
The decision that the Supreme Court made in the case of Rajiv Ghosh v. Satya Narayan Jaiswal is discussed in this article. The article focuses on the tenancy rights of legal heirs as outlined in Section 2(g) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, as well as the application of Order XII Rule 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code in cases involving eviction.
