Keeping Pace with Legal Change
It is a big move by the Supreme Court of India to render a verdict in the high profile money laundering case of Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez. The court rejected her petition to suppress the case against her in the 200 crore extortion case connected with conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar.
The decision of the Allahabad High Court issued on September 16, 2025, transcends much further than the case that it was considering. The court was concerned that police continue to use caste as a form of identification in the first quarter of the 21 st century.
The case was based on a petition by a woman who requested maintenance to her husband. The husband was a Muslim man, who had already married a second wife and already stopped maintenance payments to the first wife on the pretext that his responsibilities had been shared.
The complaint against Neha Singh Rathore was filed at Lucknow in Hazratganj police station in April under the different provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The major allegations deal with her social media content, specifically on the social site known as X (previously Twitter), which was published in the post-terrorist attack period in Pahalgam.
The controversy started with an action suit of civil defamation against Adani Enterprises in a trial court in Delhi. The firm claimed that some of the journalists such as Ravish Kumar were publishing and spreading defamatory information that was negatively affecting its reputation and business. On 6 th September, the trial court granted ex-parte interim injunction which is an order that is granted on a hearing basis without considering all the parties involved.
The main legal foundation through which India can appeal to to the WTO over the new limitations on H-1B visa would be the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). GATS regulates the transparency of the international trade in services and provides four modes of supply
The legal system of working with the distribution of false information in India is complicated, and it is in continuous development.
The charges against Samay Raina and other comedians are based on the petition filed by Cure SMA Foundation of India, which advances the cause of the people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
Aryan Khan’s entry into the world of entertainment as a director and writer has quickly landed him in the middle of a significant legal controversy. His debut series, “Bad***s of Bollywood,” has come under intense scrutiny for alleged vulgarity, sparking a heated debate about the relevance of old laws in the new age of streaming
A strange case that was in the news of the legal community recently was that of the Pravin Gandhi College of Law (PGCL). A leading legal education institution, the institution was in a fix when some of its new graduates failed to get provisional sanad by state bar councils, which is important to pass the All India Bar Examination (AIBE).
