Keeping Pace with Legal Change
To any law graduate in India, working in one of the most successful law firms such as Trilegal, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM), Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (SAM), or AZB and Partners, landing a job is what is considered the holy goal.
The supreme court of India has turned into the location where the serious debate concerning individual freedom and national security has taken place.
By the time Chief Justice of India, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud retires on November 10, 2024, the Indian judiciary will truly have come to an end. His reign has been characterized by high focus on technology, personal freedom and social responsibility.
A raging fire which erupted in a critical care unit of Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Hospital, a state run hospital in Jaipur has claimed the lives of many people and put the state government in a huge crisis of accountability
The Allahabad High Court has presented a critical meaning of the national security laws in a meaningful decision that has far-reaching consequences in free speech on the internet age. The presiding bench led by Justice Santosh Rai found that the forwarding of a post that simply contains the social media slogan, which translates to Pakistan Zindabad, was not a threat to the sovereignty or integrity of India.
The abrupt tragic and untimely demise of Assamese musical superstar Zubeen Garg in Singapore has rocked the country and the music industry and left fans and the music fraternity devastated. The events that happened to his death have now led to a heated speculation and a complicated legal case
The legal world is not an exception in the world where technology is transforming all areas of our lives. At the center of this change is a legal tech company named Adalat AI that employs the strength of AI to resolve the issues that have plagued the Indian judicial system over time
The Allahabad High Court has refused to interfere in an issue of the proposed demolition of a mosque in the Sambhal district of Uttar Pradesh. The single judge bench led by Justice Dinesh Pathak declined to grant stay to the demolition order given by local administrative authorities.
The fundamental issue in the case concerning the CCPA against Drishti IAS is the definition of the word selections. The advertisement of the coaching center was done in a way that emphasized on the number 216+, which left a strong impression in the minds of the aspiring civil servants that more than two hundred of their students had passed the ruthlessly competitive UPSC examination. The CCPA argues that such a number is a terrible distortion of the reality.
The Adani Group, a corporate giant, is India is involved in a major legal tussle that is opposed to the conglomerate by several independent journalists and media houses.
