Bombay HC Orders Meta to Take Down Defamatory Posts Linking Malabar Gold to Pakistan Engaging Alishba Khalid
Anatomy of the Malicious Smear Campaign The allegations of the online smear campaign against Malabar Gold consisted of the misleading…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Anatomy of the Malicious Smear Campaign The allegations of the online smear campaign against Malabar Gold consisted of the misleading…
Anupam Mittal got into the legal trouble when a criminal case was filed against him, claiming that he had extorted. The charges were reported to have been based on a business related dispute which the complainant sought to have structured as a criminal act.
The gist of the new turn of events is the ruling of the Calcutta high court. The court took action to stifle the process and the report of the university Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) about a sexual harassment complaint lodged against Prof. Chakrabarti by a former employee.
The scandal started happening in 2020 when the Indian farmers were actively protesting against three controversial farm laws. Kangana Ranaut was then a strong opponent of the protests.
Based on the information developed as part of the FIR, a series of so-called violations are identified by the Karur Town Police due to the extended delay. They claim that there was a certain time that had been agreed upon when Vijay was going to arrive and the ensuing address to the people which was necessary in the control of traffic flow and safeguarding the people.
The keystone of the committee recommendation is the so-called 3-2-2 year model of phased entry, a seven-year period of transition which is aimed at opening up the legal field progressively. This would subsequently take place in the first phase, a three year probationary or first entry period
The Kerala High Court has taken a major step in an effort to bring about transparency and accountability, by appointing retired Justice KT Sankaran to oversee the preparation of a list of all valuable objects at the Sabarimala Ayyappan Temple.
To further up the already simmer between big tech and the Indian government, X Corp, led by Elon Musk, has publicly criticized a recent Indian court ruling, and indicated that it intends to appeal the ruling.
In a very strong statement of judicial review, the Supreme Court of India has set aside a bail order given by a Delhi trial court in a high value cheating case amounting to 6 crores. The Supreme Court was highly critical of how the bail was awarded, as the decision made by the trial judge was highly unsound and illogical.
The decision has far-reaching consequences on social media platforms functioning in India, a petition lodged by the company that was once called Twitter (X Corp) has been rejected by the Karnataka High Court.