Attorney General Grants Consent for Contempt Case Over Shoe-Throwing Attempt by Rakesh Kishore at BR Gavai
Attorney General Grants Consent on Contempt Case Over Shoe-throwing At attempt on SC Judge. Attorney General of India, R. Venkataramani…
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
Attorney General Grants Consent on Contempt Case Over Shoe-throwing At attempt on SC Judge. Attorney General of India, R. Venkataramani…
A plea made by a government of Telangana, complaining of a High Court order that placed a stay on its…
The Allahabad High Court has expressed its strong concern with regard to the heavy misuse of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention…
A judgment of a single judge of the Madras High Court, Justice N.Senthil Kumar, passed on 3.10.2025 in Writ Petition…
The case was taken to the top court following a series of tragic events in which after giving the children who had taken over the counter cough syrups, they developed acute kidney failure which led to their deaths.
The meaning of the statement made by justice Syam Kumar did not imply alarm and was a deep-seated appeal to hard work in the judiciary. His phrases demonstrate that he has a great concern with the rule of law and preservation of the property rights of all citizens. This was observed in one of the cases referred to which a judge stressed that the legal process should be followed with care and integrity.
The recent decision by the Supreme Court has to be viewed in the background of the tough line adopted by the court in the past against firecrackers in the National Capital Region. The court had temporarily banned all conventional firecrackers through the sale, purchase and bursting of firecrackers over a number of years.
The case came to the highest court, when a team of petitioners appealed the conditions of service and privacy policy of WhatsApp that is owned by the international technology giant Meta. The petitioners claimed that today WhatsApp has become a necessary and indispensable service in India that can be used to communicate with others every day, both about personal and professional matters
The core of the problem is that it was alleged that Asian Paints, in its mighty position in the market, was able to suppress competition. The complaint was initially filed by a relatively new entrant into the paint industry with the allegation being that Asian Paints was committing anti-competitive behavior.
By Justice Markandey Katju, Judge, Supreme Court of India In ancient India not only was there tremendous development of mathematics,…