Keeping Pace with Legal Change
In Criminal Misc Application No. 118 of 2025, Uttarakhand High Court quashed the order of summoning Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. on the grounds of procedural lapses, limitation, no specifically made allegations under the Drugs Act, and no required forensic evidence.
Significance and ImpactThe ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP-19578 of 2023 illustrates the manner in which courts exercise equilibrium amid formalities of law and social justice. The judgment, in allowance of compassionate appointment of a second wife within the service rules, emphasizes equity, principles of nomination, and dependency safeguard.
This article discusses the decision of the Bombay High Court in TikTok Limited vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, in which the request to declare TikTok a well-known trademark was denied because it posed a threat to national security. The case brings out the issue of intellectual property law and national interest.
This happens to a country ruled by reactionary village idiots like Ayatollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Khameini, and other religious clerics
The Calcutta High Court upheld Susanta Chowdhury’s murder conviction, commuting his death sentence to life imprisonment without remission for 40 years. The bench found the crime premeditated and brutal yet insufficiently “rarest of rare” to warrant capital punishment, citing evidence.
The Rajasthan High Court Bar Association today expressed profound grief following the tragic Air India Ahmedabad flight crash. The association conveyed heartfelt condolences to all affected, extending prayers to those lost in the crash and at B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital. They emphasized the fragility of life and offered solidarity.
This case concerns a gold loan dispute in which the complainant, Abhishek Singh, claimed that the bank had committed fraud and misappropriation after he paid back his debts but failed to receive the gold he had pledged. Citing it as a counterblast, the High Court dismissed the FIR against bank officials. By assessing the evidence and making conclusions based on malice without a trial, the High Court exceeded its authority under Section 482 CrPC.
The Bombay High Court has upheld the 10% Maratha reservation in education and government jobs for 2025, pending final judgment. A three-judge bench will expedite hearings to scrutinize the quota’s constitutional validity amid competing claims of social justice and meritocracy.
Dhirubhai Ambani University’s School of Law launches innovative LL.M. programs blending in-depth specializations, global immersion tours, and industry-aligned internships. Guided by eminent faculty and cutting-edge research, the School aims to equip graduates with the skills and insights to excel in a global legal landscape.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Vasundhra Chhaunkar ordered an FIR in Setara Bibi’s case under Section 156(3) CrPC after alleged custodial torture led to her husband’s death. The ruling underscores judicial oversight, reinforcing firm swift accountability as police inaction obstructs justice.
Chief Judicial Magistrate Vasundhra Chhaunkar ordered an FIR in Setara Bibi’s case under Section 156(3) CrPC after alleged custodial torture led to her husband’s death. The ruling underscores judicial oversight, reinforcing firm swift accountability as police inaction obstructs justice.
