Difference between s 9 and s 11 Evidence Act (s7 and s 9 BSA) (Learning law with GPT)
Difference between s 9 and s11 evidence act is difficult to gauge. And hence i asked gpt about it. S9…
Category: Articles and Columns
Rajeev Kumar Sharma: Rajasthan’s New DGP Poised to Uphold Law and Order
Rajeev Kumar Sharma, a seasoned 1990-batch IPS officer, has been appointed as Rajasthan’s new DGP. Known for integrity and legal expertise, he is expected to strengthen law enforcement, improve police efficiency, and ensure public safety through fair and effective leadership.
Rajasthan Court Summons Drishti IAS Founder Vikas Divyakirti Over Derogatory Judicial Remarks
Ajmer court has taken cognizance of a criminal complaint against Drishti IAS founder Vikas Divyakirti for allegedly making sarcastic and defamatory comments about the judiciary in a viral video. He has been summoned to appear personally on July 22 for apparent offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and IT Act.
Delhi High Court Stays Release of ‘Udaipur Files’, Directs Petitioners to Follow Statutory Route
The Delhi High Court put on hold the release of ‘Udaipur Files’ on July 10, 2025, on charges of procedural non-compliance. Petitioners Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind and journalist Prashant Tandon objected to the CBFC certification of the film for promoting communal disharmony. The Court instructed them to approach the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The release of the film is stuck until the government makes a decision within a week after hearing both parties. The decision highlights statutory remedy and a judicious balance between free speech and public order.
Supreme Court Rejects Plea for Exclusive Buddhist Control of Mahabodhi Temple, Refers Matter to Patna HC
In a 2025 judgement, the Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a petition under Article 32 seeking exclusive Buddhist control over the Mahabodhi Temple, Bodh Gaya. Filed by ex-minister Sulekhatai Kumbhare, the petition challenged the constitutional validity of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949. The Court cited procedural grounds, suggesting the matter be taken to the Patna High Court. The case underscores ongoing tensions around religious autonomy and minority rights in sacred site administration.
Supreme Court Rejects Lalit Modi’s Plea to Shift FEMA Penalty to BCCI, Clarifies Limits of Writ Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court dismissed Lalit Modi’s writ petition seeking indemnification from BCCI for a ₹10.65 crore FEMA penalty arising from the 2009 IPL shift to South Africa. It ruled that BCCI is not a “State” under Article 226 for internal financial disputes. While Modi can pursue civil remedies, writ jurisdiction is not applicable for private indemnity claims. The ruling reinforces the boundary between public and private functions of sporting bodies like BCCI.
Opposition to MS Dhoni’s ‘Captain Cool’ Trademark Argues Fame Alone Can’t Secure Generic Phrase
A legal challenge is underway against MS Dhoni’s “Captain Cool” trademark. Opponents argue the phrase is too generic for exclusive ownership, even for a celebrity. They contend fame alone shouldn’t secure a common term, raising questions about distinctiveness and proper trademark use.
Supreme Court Affirms Lawyer’s Conviction for Outraging Modesty of Female Judge in Open Court
The Supreme Court has upheld the 18-month prison sentence and conviction of a Delhi lawyer for making abusive and sexually insulting remarks about a woman judge in court. The judgment supports the judiciary’s stance to uphold decorum and dignity of judicial officials, particularly women, within the premises of the court.
Much ado about nothing By Justice Katju
These days a hot discussion is going on in India, particularly in political circles and the media, about the forthcoming…
Kerala High Court Rules GST Notice via WhatsApp Invalid; Upholds Statutory Notice Requirements
In Mathai M.V. v. State GST, the Kerala High Court held that GST notices issued through WhatsApp are not legitimate under Section 169 of the CGST Act. The court emphasized that compliance with procedure and statutory means such as registered post or e-mail is to be followed for legal notice. It held that WhatsApp communication, which is allowed only as a pandemic exception, is against natural justice when used otherwise. The order of confiscation was therefore set aside, and fresh notice was directed.