PIL in P&H High Court Questions Haryana Cow Protection Law Amid Vigilantism Surge
The Punjab and Haryana High Court is in the process of reviewing a grave court challenge against one of the controversial laws in the state of Haryana.
Keeping Pace with Legal Change
The Punjab and Haryana High Court is in the process of reviewing a grave court challenge against one of the controversial laws in the state of Haryana.
The Central Government is now being questioned by the Supreme Court of India, regarding a major and extended delay in finalizing its decision on the mercy of Balwant Singh Rajoana.
The Delhi High Court has given an extremely important order to the Central Government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in a move that is deemed very crucial in enforcing the rights and dignity of every citizen
This is a major ruling that the Karnataka High Court has made in refusing a petition by X Corp, the company that was earlier referred to as Twitter.
The questioning of the Supreme Court suggested that a more proper and fair solution can be the financial compensation. This would not even defend the reputation of the person, but would eliminate the fear of criminal conviction and jailing that can be abused to subdue dissent and questioning.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has gone on record to oppose the misuse of laws that are intended to safeguard the women and it has instructed authorities to take legal action against a woman who filed a rape complaint as false.
A former employee of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) which is the external intelligence agency in India filed the PIL. The main reason of the plea is that this burial ground in one of the complexes of prisons controlled by the state might serve as an idea-giver to the anti-national factors and secessionists.
It is a big move by the Supreme Court of India to render a verdict in the high profile money laundering case of Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez. The court rejected her petition to suppress the case against her in the 200 crore extortion case connected with conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar.
The decision of the Allahabad High Court issued on September 16, 2025, transcends much further than the case that it was considering. The court was concerned that police continue to use caste as a form of identification in the first quarter of the 21 st century.
The case was based on a petition by a woman who requested maintenance to her husband. The husband was a Muslim man, who had already married a second wife and already stopped maintenance payments to the first wife on the pretext that his responsibilities had been shared.