High court

Saif Ali Khan Faces Major Setback as MP High Court Reopens ₹15,000 Cr. Royal Property Dispute

Through this article we discuss the opinion of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the Bhopal Nawab property succession case as it throws light on the complicated legal issues of the private property of former rulers. The case was remanded to the court to be tried once again, with stress on personal law, merger agreements and the clauses of the constitution especially in the case when a previous judgment on which the case had laid its relied-upon basis was being abridged by the Supreme Court.

High court

Andhra Pradesh High Court Warns Magistrates Against Mechanical Remands for Social Media Posts

The present article discusses an order by the Andhra Pradesh High Court regarding arrest and remand in relations to the social media. It brings to light the fact that the court put a stress on sticking to

[Arnesh Kumar and Imran Pratap Gadhi judgments, to guard against the possible abuse of the criminal law and also safeguarding the freedom of expression by committing the courage to question any police action in a court of law.]

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules No Insurance for Legal Heirs in Rash Driving Fatalities

According to a decision by the Supreme Court, the legal heirs can not demand insurance in case of death caused by rash driving of the deceased. This choice solidifies individual responsibility, blocks the possibility of generating revenue out of a wrong as well as encourages responsible driving, which affects the insurance policy holders and the scrutiny of insurance claims, as well.

Current Legal Update

Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill: Easy Explanation of Tax and Spending Changes

In this article, the explanation of the Trump Big Beautiful Bill is presented in an easy way as it offers big tax cuts and new deductions as well as permanent rate extensions on a person and business. It also spells out huge spending cuts to border security and defense, as well as social safety net services, such as Medicaid and SNAP, and clean energy tax credits.

High court

Pune Court Rejects Plea to Force Rahul Gandhi to Produce Book in Savarkar Defamation Case

In this paper, the author will discuss the recent court order on Satyaki Savarkar vs. Rahul Gandhi is making an argument based on the inherent right against self-incrimination portrayed in the Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. It brings out the refusal of the court to force the accused to tender incriminating documents prior to trial, the onus of proof where it rests upon the complainant and the presumption of innocence.

High court

Delhi HC Rules WhatsApp, Email Exchanges Form Valid Arbitration Agreement

The article discusses the case law of the Delhi High Court on interim forms of arbitration: through the formation of the contract online, territorial jurisdiction and difficulty of awarding unliquidated damages. The electronic arbitration contracts were confirmed by the court, however, jurisdiction and security of unquantified claims were rejected, which points out some important legal provisions to apply in commercial conflicts.

High court

Delhi HC Rules Against Patanjali’s False Efficacy Claims in Chyawanprash Ads

In this post the case of the Delhi High Court handling the deception around the Patanjali Chyawanprash advertisement is analysed in view of its legal precedent related to false efficacy claims and disparagement. It goes into the pace of development of commercial speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian constitution, the landmark cases which outline its extent and restriction in advertising.

High court

Kerala High Court Draws on Ramayan Author Valmiki’s Life to Advocate Criminal Rehabilitation

Delhi High Court decision on Dabur v Patanjali enlightened the Ayurvedic medicines with regard to advertising. It highlighted the need for tighter truthfulness on health products as the ads were considered by Patanjali as demeaning on Dabur Chyawanprash and other brands. The court also noted how misleading comparisons are not permissible and fair competition should be guarded against.

Current Legal Update

Kerala HC Cites Valmiki’s Transformation to Highlight Criminal Reformation

The article discusses the results of the case analyzed by the High Court on the issue of the constant and infamous designation of someone as a rowdy and the open disclosure of their criminal record. It throws some light on the reformation inclined focus of the court, the right to privacy of a citizen and the delicate position of police surveillance, which eventually decides to have the name of a petitioner off a rowdy list after a long history of well-behaved behavior.

Current Legal Update

Allahabad HC Rules BNSS Anticipatory Bail Provisions Apply Retrospectively

In this article, we are going to examine the Abdul Hameed v. State case, a landmark judgment explaining anticipatory bail under the new BNSS in India. It focuses on the maintenance of consecutive bail applications, the retrospective effect of procedural legislations such as BNSS and principle of beneficial law in the sense that the evolution of the law legally deserves reconsideration of bail considering the new legal considerations.