Judicial Restraint in the Spotlight: CJI B.R. Gavai Explains Why Judges Avoid Public Platforms
In this article, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai discusses his thoughts on the reasons why judges have generally refrained from communicating with the public on public venues. Specifically, it investigates the origins of judicial restraint in the context of maintaining impartiality, the difficulties that are presented by live streaming and social media, and the possibility that statements could be taken out of context. Gavai places a strong emphasis on the necessity for judges to maintain a proper distance while remaining acutely aware of the realities of society. Also discussed in this post is the necessity of striking a balance between the integrity of judicial decision-making and the implementation of technological and transparency efforts. In conclusion, it examines the changing nature of judicial behavior in the future, taking into account the advent of instant communication and the extensive monitoring of the public.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed